http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2009/04/819/ For the organization and appreciation of book cover design Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:13:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2009/04/819/comment-page-1/#comment-2870 Rebecca Fri, 01 May 2009 16:23:55 +0000 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/?p=819#comment-2870 The demo book ended up with the author’s name almost cut off at the bottom of the cover and, judging by the slant of the author’s name in a brief glimpse of the cover near the end of the video, inaccurately trimmed. This makes me wonder if the manufacturer (or at least their marketing department) knows much about printing books. They easily could have chosen a demo book that did not point out the flaws in their process.

]]> http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2009/04/819/comment-page-1/#comment-2709 Nate Salciccioli Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:09:27 +0000 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/?p=819#comment-2709 Hey look! A Cotton Gin!

]]> http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2009/04/819/comment-page-1/#comment-2699 patrick Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:13:07 +0000 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/?p=819#comment-2699 This thing is just a glorified version of the copiers/booklet makers that every print and copy shop already operates, only it requires more maintenance, prep, and waste.

]]> http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2009/04/819/comment-page-1/#comment-2596 Judson Collier Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:43:33 +0000 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/?p=819#comment-2596 Way less impressive now that I see it cuts an entire tree off at the end of the process.

]]> http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2009/04/819/comment-page-1/#comment-2595 Jason Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:37:27 +0000 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/?p=819#comment-2595 How does it require “minimal” maintenance? I’d hate to try fixing a paper jam in that bad boy. Thanks for this, interesting.

]]>