http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2008/11/25/ For the organization and appreciation of book cover design Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:04:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2008/11/25/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Pieratt Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:54:43 +0000 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/?p=25#comment-4 Suzanne - thanks for the response! I don't think we would have argued that it was the right choice for the final product for the same reasons that you've already stated, we're just exercising our rights as the Completely Uninvolved to nitpick and provide unsolicited preference. Suzanne – thanks for the response!
I don’t think we would have argued that it was the right choice for the final product for the same reasons that you’ve already stated, we’re just exercising our rights as the Completely Uninvolved to nitpick and provide unsolicited preference.

]]> http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/2008/11/25/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Suzanne LaGasa Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:57:56 +0000 http://blog.bookcoverarchive.com/?p=25#comment-3 That bottom right cover was Chronicle Books designer's favorite cover as well. But in discussions with others, some felt it was too obscure, pegging the book too much in the 60's, and failing to convey "movie" and/or "poster." It definitely stands out... That bottom right cover was Chronicle Books designer’s favorite cover as well. But in discussions with others, some felt it was too obscure, pegging the book too much in the 60’s, and failing to convey “movie” and/or “poster.” It definitely stands out…

]]>